Sam Ruby: Possibly as early as October, and certainly no
later than the end of the year, these warnings will be converted
over to errors.
The time has arrived. Where there previously was only a
general warning, you now get specific, element by element, and
attribute by attribute indication of what needs to change to make
your Atom feeds conform to
You may also find
to be helpful.
The goal remains to make Atom 0.3 irrelevant by the time Windows
Longhorn Vista is generally available. Which according to
reliable and always authoritative Wikipedia is September
Now if we can only
nudge the wordpress folks to take atom 1.0 seriously as of right now i believe that 1.0 is not even planned for wordpress 2.0.
[link] Darryl at
The feed validator seems to be broken as of today.
Someone please crank it up again... Thomas Gumz at
I do have an atom 1.0 feed, but as neither planet apache or bloglines like it, I think I’m going to stick to RSS as the primary source for some time...
Steve Loughran at
No kidding. Bloglines seems unable to fix their parser for any format.
Robert Sayre at
Thomas: what problem are you seeing with the Feed Validator? It seems to be up now.
Steve: Planet Apache seems to do OK with my Atom 1.0 feed. And if you use Bloglines, you might want to read this. Sam Ruby
Sam: I’m getting consistently the error:
“Sorry: An error occurred while trying to validate this feed.”
I can see that ‘whirlwind.he.net’ contacts my server, but that’s about it. I just tried to validate your own feed at
[link] , same problem.
Thanks for looking into it. Thomas Gumz at
feedvalidator.org instead of atomenabled’s copy, and I will look into the problem on the atomenabled site. Sam Ruby at
[link] works fine. Thank you. Thomas Gumz at