intertwingly

It’s just data

OPML Interop


Dave Winer: Chris Janton pointed out that some of my OPML isn’t properly handled by another OPML-processing application, and that my own validator rejects it as invalid.

I’ve corrected the feedvalidator to not report that message for OPML 2.0 feeds.  The message still is produced for OPML 1.1 feeds, per the test case.

Other problems I noted: it looks like the example isn’t well formed xml, as it includes duplicate attributes.  Additionally, it also contains a number of attributes which are not defined on this page that are not in a namespace.