You are skeptical that Peter wants that? You are skeptical about that being a good idea? You are skeptical about the rest of the TAG wanting that? The subsequent sentence of the nominees being good people also does not follow naturally to me.
You certainly are a good person with a lot to contribute.
That being said, I am skeptical that electing you to the TAG will achieve the result that Peter is looking for.
Expanding on that: I see a lot of claims of “ivory tower!” and “reform!”. And yet I don’t see anybody (outside of potentially Marcos) running on a platform of getting the TAG more involved in the manner Peter describes.