Problems with draft 12:
-
Change application/atomserv+xml to application/atomsvc+xml (and .atomsrv to .atomsvc). reference
-
Remove app:edited
-
Change the accept value 'entry' to 'application/atom+xml;type=entry'
-
Section 4 (Protocol Model) mentions, in its fourth paragraph "mime-types". This ought to be "media types". ref
-
I know the concept of 'file extensions' does not it exist for IRIs. Nevertheless I find it odd to see ".cats" used this way in section 8.1's example: "http://example.com/cats/forMain.cats". Shouldn't we use an 'extension' of ".atomcat", if we use one at all? ref
-
Section 8.2.5 (The "app:categories" Element) is redundant; it just reiterates information found already in section 7.2.1.1 (Attributes of "app:categories"), with only slight differences in wording but none in meaning. ref
-
Section 9.2.1's last paragraph does not make sense to me: "In particular, the publishing system in this example *filled in* some values *not provided* in the original POST. For example, it ascertained the name of the author, presumably via the authentication protocol used to establish the right to post." (Emphasis added) ref
-
Section 9.2.1's example declares the APP namespace, but I don't see for what reason. What, if anything, do you want to exemplify by this? That the server does not silently discards the declaration? ref
Not all of these items are expected to be addressed. This is just a list of things that have been brought up and a concensus call for each is needed for them to be folded into the next draft.