intertwingly

It’s just data

null


Clemens Vasters: That'd truly be silly, wouldn't it? [Executive summary: Those who only look at wire formats and are obsessed with loose coupling shall look at some more complex and real-world scenarios once in a while]  Hmmm.  I wonder who that might be directed at? :-)

FYI: tomorrow, I will have been at IBM for 21 years.  I spent nearly a decade working on AD/Cycle Information Model and Repository tasks.  One customer I worked with during that period you may have heard of: GAD.

As to your example, there is no question that two "customer" entites that are semantically different should be modelled separately.  The question to ponder is whether or not "ALTER TABLE table_name ADD column_name datatype" should be allowed and what the implications of this are.